Whole House Energy Monitoring

I placed an order for a TED 5000 on February 10th. The TED 5000 is a whole house energy monitor — a kill-a-watt for the whole house. I’ve spent a lot of time reading about the products available in this space. I’ve looked at about 10 products for whole house energy monitoring and three jump to the top. The wattvision, PowerHouse Dynamics’s eMonitor, and the TED 5000.

The wattvision (~$250) most closely resembles the TED in terms of price and features. The wattvision uses an optical sensor that counts the rotation of the disk in the utility meter. This sensor is connected to the device, which is powered by an AC adapter and sends the data to wattvision’s servers via your home wifi network. This is the easiest to install, but would require running the sensor cable from the outside to inside. Additionally, all data is sent to wattvision’s servers. I’d also need to subscribe to wattvision’s $8.99/month service for the other features I want (like API access.)

The eMonitor (starting around $688 for 12 circuits) is something I just recently discovered. Really, this is my ideal solution: for $1,277, you get the necessary equipment for monitoring the power feed plus 44 individual breakers. This gives a much better view of where your power consumption is going. Per-circuit monitoring also enables nifty alerts — an SMS for power draw in the kids room after school starts on a week day, or if the compressor on the fridge is running longer than normal (time to clean the coils, etc.) I just can’t justify the expense at $1,277. The price is certainly reasonable for what you are getting, but there is no way the wife would approve the purchase :/

The Energy Detective (TED, ~$200) from Energy Inc provides full house consumption monitoring like the wattvision. Unlike the wattvision, the data is stored and served from a gateway device on your home network. Two current transformers go around the two lines for the incoming split phase feed. These are connected to a box, which is installed next-to-or-inside the breaker panel. The breaker panel is powered and communicates via a connection to a breaker on each phase. The gateway is installed elsewhere in the house and plugs into an outlet for power and communication with the current sensor, and via Ethernet to serve its precious data up.

So, February 10th I finally got approval from the wife to order the TED and purchased the TED 5000-G with overnight shipping. It arrived as expected on the 11th and I was eager to install it. A coworker (also interested in the TED,) came over for dinner and to help out with the installation. I was too excited to wait for his arrival and finished the install before he got there ;-).

It’s now February 27th and I still don’t have a working TED system. The gateway I was originally shipped has a defective Ethernet port. It’s already been to Energy Inc and back and is still defective. They finally agreed to ship me a replacement gateway on the 25th but sent it with 2nd day shipping, which has the same transit time as ground (just more expensive.) The new unit should arrive March 1st.

Optional TED Display


I’m quite eager to get things up and running, and anticipate no problems once I have a working gateway. The most common issue people run into is excessive noise or attenuation of the power line communications (PLC) signal between the sensor and gateway. The forums seem to be full of people with lots of grief around this issue. The gateway does contain a ZigBee transceiver but that is for communication with the optional wireless display. Some have questioned switching from PLC to ZigBee for the current data but a device inside the metal breaker box would have a hard time getting any sort of RF signal out, and PLC seems the most logical solution (even with it’s inherent issues.)  Of course, this is easy for me to say since I don’t anticipate having any issue with PLC. I can see a clear ~3-4Vpk signal on the zero crossing of the A/C at the outlet I plan to install the gateway:

AC with TED MCU transmissions

I have another blog post in the works documenting my seemingly unending issues with the other half of the TED solution: the support staff and engineers backing the product. To be fair, the support staff is 1:2 — the second guy I spoke to there was great, but I’m pretty sure their engineers shouldn’t be allowed to know customers even exist, let alone talk to them on the phone. But, this is a story for my next blog post.

This entry was posted in geek and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Whole House Energy Monitoring

  1. Full disclosure I’m the CEO of Blue Line Innovations, a competing technology to the CT technology used by TED and other approaches.

    I’m sorry that you have had a disappointing experience to date. The power of real time energy data is real.

    I would invite you to explore our DIY optical sensing technology. We have been in this space since 2004 and as you have experienced simple, universal, consumer friendly technology is critical for wide spread consumer adoption – that’s our focus. We are the only electricity monitoring company in partnership with both Microsoft Hohm and Google PowerMeter.

    Give us a whirl. I would look forward to your feedback and comparisons to your present experience.

    Thanks for helping to spread the word – good or bad.

    Sincerely,

    Peter Porteous
    CEO
    Blue Line Innovations

  2. Wattvision says:

    Hi! Thanks for thinking of us. Your feedback about the API access is noted, thank you. Let us know if you have any trouble setting up your TED! You can still get your TED Data on Wattvision with our TED > Wattvision connector software. Thanks and let us know if you have any questions or comments at info@wattvision.com.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>